As the editorial puts it: '(The oral tradition)...deals not with facts but with the truths inherent in legend and myth': Truths as opposed to facts.
This reminded me of an interview on the CBC show Tapestry where Pastor Nadia Bolz-Weber says things like: 'the enlightenment ... robbed us of enchantment, I want it back' and 'There are different ways of knowing, different ways of accessing truth...' (CBC Tapestry - The Tattooed Pastor. Jan 10, 2016 )
Which of course brings us to the similarities between the indigenous oral tradition and religion(You could argue that the Bible is an oral tradition that's been written down): truths do not necessarily depend on facts.
Stories have always been a part of our culture and history. Science and structured logic, somewhat more recent. Most people will have a foot in both worlds, probably most of us lop-sided to one way or the other. Maybe with the discussion at UBC the border will become even more blurred.
Myself, I supposed I've always been more science-minded, facts based, but these ideas have got me thinking. Not that I need to go too far. My past life as musician definitely bridged both: practicing scales, and then more scales, but then those magical moments on stage(perhaps too few for me), when it all worked, and a story somehow emerged.
I still recall a time during the Vancouver Jazz Festival, playing with Coat Cooke and the Evolution, and my back was seriously out-of-whack. I was hobbling to get on stage. Our guitar player, the great Ron Samworth, just looked at me and said: 'Just tell your story, man'.
No comments:
Post a Comment